Show how a claim gets checked.

Every step of a check stays visible: who else reported it, whether it was checked before and who published it.

What slows you down

  1. A verdict ends the discussion

    A true-or-false label teaches less than the steps that lead to it.

  2. Good examples take time to prepare

    Building a real case for a workshop by hand takes hours.

  3. Screenshots lose their sources

    A slide without links can’t be checked by the group.

What verification teams told us about working under pressure: read the research.

How Veruno helps

  1. Step 1

    Start from a real claim

    Find one in Claim Radar and open its triage report.

  2. Step 2

    Look at the source together

    Each signal says what it means and where it came from.

  3. Step 3

    Keep the exercise on one board

    Collect notes and links in Workspace and hand out the PDF report.

A real example

The story and its sources are fictional; the report is laid out exactly as in Veruno.

In a workshop, the group opens the Harlow report. Three sources confirm the fire, none confirms the poisoning, and the site is nine days old. The discussion turns to what to ask the Water Authority.

Which plan fits

Teams that run workshops together usually start on Advanced: trainers share the same cases, boards and monthly tokens.

Recommended for media-literacy teams

Advanced$90 / month
  • Unlimited seats
  • Shared boards and roles
  • 2,500 tokens a month, shared

One trainer? Basic is a personal plan with 1 seat.

Common questions

No. It shows triage signals and the sources behind them, so the discussion stays on the evidence.